Cases1308904/2023

Claimant v Element Materials Technology Aerospace UK Ltd

6 November 2025Before Employment Judge EdmondsBirmingham

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent had a fair reason for dismissal and followed a fair procedure. The dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer.

Constructive Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent did not breach the implied term of trust and confidence such that the claimant was entitled to resign and treat himself as constructively dismissed.

Automatic Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed for making protected disclosures. The principal reason for dismissal was unrelated to any alleged whistleblowing.

Whistleblowingfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant was not subjected to any detriment for making protected disclosures. Either the disclosures were not protected or the detriments were not causally linked to the disclosures.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent was contractually entitled to make the deductions from wages or that the sums were properly withheld.

Holiday Payfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant had been paid all holiday pay to which he was entitled or had not accrued unpaid holiday at termination.

Otherfailed

The tribunal found no breach of section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 regarding the right to be accompanied at disciplinary or grievance hearings.

Facts

Mr Roberts brought multiple claims against Element Materials Technology Aerospace UK Ltd including unfair dismissal, constructive dismissal, automatic unfair dismissal for whistleblowing, detriment for making protected disclosures, unlawful deduction of wages, failure to pay holiday pay, and breach of the right to be accompanied. The case was heard over four days before a full tribunal panel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims. The tribunal found that any dismissal was fair and within the band of reasonable responses, that the claimant was not constructively dismissed, was not dismissed or subjected to detriment for whistleblowing, and that there were no unlawful wage deductions or unpaid holiday pay.

Practical note

Multiple whistleblowing claims combined with wage and dismissal claims were all unsuccessful, highlighting the difficulty claimants face in establishing causation between protected disclosures and subsequent treatment or dismissal.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Relations Act 1999 s.10

Case details

Case number
1308904/2023
Decision date
6 November 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
aerospace
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep