Cases8000019/2025

Claimant v Conilon Ltd

5 November 2025Before Employment Judge A KempScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to respond to multiple requests for information dated 4, 16, and 26 September and 7 October 2025, and did not respond to strike out warning issued 20 October 2025.

Facts

Ms Swann brought a claim against Conilon Ltd. The Tribunal requested further information on 4 September 2025 but received no response. Further reminders were sent on 16 and 26 September and 7 October 2025, all without response. A strike out warning was issued on 20 October 2025, giving a deadline of 3 November 2025, but the claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds of non-compliance with tribunal orders and failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant did not respond to multiple requests for information or to the strike out warning.

Practical note

Unrepresented claimants who fail to respond to tribunal orders and requests for information risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even without a hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(c)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
8000019/2025
Decision date
5 November 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No