Cases6020043/2025

Claimant v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited

5 November 2025Before Employment Judge DuffLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,181

Individual claims

Holiday Paysucceeded

The Tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay for holiday accrued but not taken during 01 January 2024 to 31 March 2024 totalling £876.26. The respondent also underpaid the claimant for annual leave taken between February 2024 and March 2025 by £304.80.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim for holiday pay against her employer, Bidvest Noonan (UK) Ltd. The respondent failed to file their ET3 defence in time and when refiled 11 days late, their extension application was rejected. The claim proceeded as a default judgment on the basis that the respondent had not filed a valid response. The claimant was owed money for holiday accrued but not taken during Q1 2024 and was also underpaid for annual leave taken between February 2024 and March 2025.

Decision

The Tribunal refused the respondent's extension of time application to file their defence because they found no reasonable excuse for the late filing and no mitigating factors despite the respondent acting swiftly once notified. The holiday pay claim succeeded in full with the Tribunal awarding £876.26 for unpaid accrued holiday and £304.80 for underpayment of annual leave taken, totalling £1,181.06.

Practical note

Strict adherence to tribunal time limits for filing defences is essential, and even swift remedial action may not excuse non-compliance without a credible reason; default judgments can result in full liability for holiday pay claims.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£1,181

Case details

Case number
6020043/2025
Decision date
5 November 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No