Cases6021972/2024

Claimant v Metroline Travel Limited

4 November 2025Before Employment Judge BaranWatford

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found the dismissal was not unfair under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent established a potentially fair reason for dismissal and acted within the band of reasonable responses. The procedural steps taken by the employer were sufficient to render the dismissal fair.

Facts

Mr Gdey was employed by Metroline Travel Limited, a transport company. He was dismissed and brought a claim of unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996. A two-day full merits hearing was held in November 2025. The claimant was represented by a lay representative, Miss W Gdey, while the respondent was represented by counsel, Mrs A Niaz-Dickinson.

Decision

The tribunal found that the dismissal was not unfair. The respondent had established a potentially fair reason for dismissal and followed a fair procedure. The claim was dismissed.

Practical note

The judgment demonstrates the importance of employers establishing both a fair reason for dismissal and following reasonable procedural steps to defend unfair dismissal claims successfully.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 Part X

Case details

Case number
6021972/2024
Decision date
4 November 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep