Cases2301761/2024

Claimant v Cygnet Health Care Limited

30 October 2025Before Employment Judge E FowellLondon South (Croydon)remote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Wrongful Dismissalwithdrawn

Withdrawn by claimant after the respondent paid the notice pay that had been owed since dismissal.

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The dismissal was fair. The claimant had been on modified duties for 2 years and 8 months at significant cost, with no realistic prospect of recovery to pass the PMVA training required for full duties. The employer acted reasonably in treating capability as a sufficient reason for dismissal and went well beyond the 'extra mile' required for work-related injuries.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

This appears to be discrimination arising from disability under s.15 Equality Act rather than direct discrimination. The dismissal was justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (ensuring duties carried out in a risk-free manner), applying the same balancing test as unfair dismissal.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)failed

The employer made all reasonable adjustments. The claimant was accommodated on light/admin duties for over 2.5 years at significant cost. Working from home was not reasonable. The requirement to stand for long periods was not established as a PCP. The only question was how long to wait for recovery, which was already answered - 2 years 8 months was more than reasonable.

Facts

Mrs Hamilton-Julien, a mental health nurse, injured her leg during mandatory PMVA training in January 2021, one week after starting employment. She suffered a hamstring tear and was unable to complete the physical training required for ward duties. She was accommodated on light/admin duties as a supernumerary for 2 years 8 months at significant cost (over £100,000). In November 2022 she suffered a second work injury (wrist) when a shelf collapsed. Despite physiotherapy, her condition deteriorated and she required a walking aid. She was dismissed on capability grounds in September 2023 when there was no realistic prospect of recovery to pass PMVA training.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims. The dismissal was fair despite being for work-related injuries - the employer had gone well beyond the 'extra mile' by supporting her for 2 years 8 months with no realistic prospect of recovery. The same reasoning applied to discrimination arising from disability (justified as proportionate). Reasonable adjustments had been made - the question was simply how long to wait, and 2 years 8 months was more than reasonable.

Practical note

Employers are not obliged to retain employees with work-related injuries indefinitely: even where an employer must 'go the extra mile', over 2.5 years of accommodation at significant cost with no realistic prospect of recovery is more than reasonable.

Legal authorities cited

Spencer v Paragon Wallpapers Ltd [1977] ICR 301O'Brien v Bolton St Catherine's Academy [2017] ICR 737Royal Bank of Scotland v McAdie [2008] ICR 1087Frewin v Consignia plc [2003] All ER (D) 314BS v Dundee CC [2014] IRLR 131

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.98ERA 1996 s.94Equality Act 2010 s.21Equality Act 2010 s.20Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
2301761/2024
Decision date
30 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Mental Health Nurse
Service
3 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No