Cases6004973/2024

Claimant v Burberry Limited

30 October 2025Before Employment Judge Mr G. KingLondon Central

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)withdrawn

The claimant withdrew claims in respect of failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to items (a) to (e) inclusive in the agreed List of Issues. The tribunal dismissed these claims by way of withdrawal.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal found the claim of discrimination arising from disability pursuant to s.15 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and dismissed it.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)failed

The tribunal found the claim in respect of failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to items (f) to (i) inclusive in the agreed List of Issues was not well founded and dismissed it.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The tribunal found the claim of direct discrimination in relation to disability pursuant to s.13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and dismissed it.

Facts

Mr Benedict Das brought disability discrimination claims against his employer Burberry Limited. The claims included failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and direct disability discrimination. The claimant withdrew some of the reasonable adjustments claims during the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims. The withdrawn reasonable adjustments claims (items a-e) were dismissed by way of withdrawal. The remaining claims for discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments (items f-i), and direct disability discrimination were found not well founded and dismissed.

Practical note

This case demonstrates the importance of properly particularising disability discrimination claims and establishing the factual basis for both reasonable adjustments failures and discrimination arising from disability.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

EqA 2010 s.13EqA 2010 s.15EqA 2010 s.20EqA 2010 s.21

Case details

Case number
6004973/2024
Decision date
30 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister