Claimant v C D Leisure (Glasgow) Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The respondent failed to present a response or defend the claim, and judgment was issued under Rule 22 based on the available material.
The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent failed to present a response or defend the claim, and judgment was issued under Rule 22 based on the available material.
The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The respondent failed to present a response or defend the claim, and judgment was issued under Rule 22 based on the available material.
Facts
The claimant P Macpherson brought claims against C D Leisure (Glasgow) Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract regarding notice, and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent failed to present any response to the claim.
Decision
The tribunal issued judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the available material, finding in favour of the claimant on all three claims and awarding a total of £546.37 comprising unpaid wages, notice pay, and holiday pay.
Practical note
Default judgments under Rule 22 allow tribunals to determine claims on available material where no response is presented, though the amounts awarded suggest relatively modest claims that could have been defended had the respondent engaged.
Award breakdown
Case details
- Case number
- 8000980/2025
- Decision date
- 30 October 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No