Claimant v Mr Yu Wang
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to determine the claims. The claims were lodged approximately four years out of time and the tribunal was satisfied it was reasonably practicable to have lodged in time (ACAS contacted in May 2021). Additionally, the claimants accepted they were employed by Uniview Limited (a dissolved company), not by the respondent Mr Wang personally, so claims against him had no prospect of success.
Facts
Four claimants who had worked at Uniview Restaurant claimed unpaid furlough pay from March 2020 to June 2021. Their employer was Uniview Limited, which was dissolved on 22 June 2021. The claimants named the company's sole director, Mr Wang, as respondent. They contacted ACAS in May 2021 but did not lodge tribunal claims. Instead, they attempted to file a Sheriff Court action in March 2022, which was defective and never pursued. They finally lodged tribunal claims in July 2025, approximately four years after the last alleged deduction.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the claims for lack of jurisdiction. The claims were struck out on two grounds: first, they were lodged approximately four years out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have lodged in time (the claimants had contacted ACAS in May 2021), and in any event four years was not a reasonable period thereafter. Second, the claimants accepted they were employed by Uniview Limited (now dissolved), not by Mr Wang personally, so the claims against him had no prospect of success.
Practical note
Claims must be brought against the correct legal entity (the employing company, not its director personally), and a four-year delay in bringing tribunal proceedings is wholly unreasonable even where the pandemic caused initial difficulties in accessing advice.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4102110/2025
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Mr Yu Wang
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- Restaurant worker
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No