Cases6001048/2024

Claimant v University of Bristol

24 October 2025Before Employment Judge WoodheadBristolremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Facts

The Respondent university applied to strike out certain issues (numbered 17.1, 18.1 and 41.1.1) from a list of issues that had been set out at a preliminary hearing on 18 July 2025. The application was made under Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The hearing was conducted in private by video (CVP) on 23 October 2025.

Decision

Employment Judge Woodhead dismissed the Respondent's strike-out application. The judge gave oral reasons at the hearing explaining the decision, meaning the claims referenced in issues 17.1, 18.1 and 41.1.1 will proceed to a full hearing.

Practical note

A respondent's application to strike out specific issues at a preliminary hearing was unsuccessful, demonstrating the high threshold for strike-out applications under Rule 38.

Case details

Case number
6001048/2024
Decision date
24 October 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister