Claimant v Abbeyfield Stewartry Society
Outcome
Individual claims
Claimants alleged unlawful deduction for accommodation offset during sleep-in shifts. Tribunal found that accommodation offset was authorised by statute under National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015 regulation 14(1), and the respondent was entitled to make such deductions without this constituting an unlawful deduction from wages.
Claimants claimed they should have been paid NMW for all hours during sleep-in shifts (10.30pm-7.30am). Tribunal applied Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake and found claimants were only entitled to NMW when actually awake and working, not merely available. The contractual arrangement paying an allowance equivalent to four hours at NMW was lawful.
Claimants sought payment for 15 minutes handover time before each shift. Tribunal found claimants failed to discharge burden of proof that they worked 15 minutes before shift start. The practice of arriving early was a courtesy to relieve outgoing workers, with no sanctions for non-compliance, and staff could leave early. No working time requirement was established.
Holiday pay was recalculated and paid by respondent prior to hearing, using correct 52-week reference period rather than 12 weeks. Claimants confirmed sums paid were correct and accepted payment, though initially declined to withdraw the claim. Since sums sought were paid, the claim was dismissed as no longer live.
First claimant claimed breach of contract for failure to provide minimum 22 hours per week as house assistant. Tribunal found contract stated hours 'shall not normally be less than 22 a week' which did not create a guaranteed minimum. Following phased return after injury, respondent offered extra shifts where possible but was not contractually obliged to guarantee any minimum hours.
Claimants claimed breach of s.8 ERA 1996 regarding itemised pay statements, arguing insufficient detail about night shift payment breakdown and accommodation offset. Tribunal found pay statements complied with s.8 by showing aggregate figures (permitted under s.8(2)(e)), and accommodation offset need not be shown as it was authorised by statute.
Facts
Two Polish-speaking care workers at a charity providing care for older people brought claims for unlawful deductions relating to accommodation offset during sleep-in shifts, underpayment during sleep-in hours, and 15-minute unpaid handovers. The first claimant resigned in May 2025; the second remained employed. The respondent operated a complex payment system involving NMW uplift and accommodation offset, paying staff an allowance equivalent to four hours at NMW for sleep-in periods (10.30pm-7.30am), with additional pay if disturbed for over four hours. Holiday pay was recalculated and paid before the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all claims. The accommodation offset was lawful under the NMW Regulations. Applying Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, workers are only entitled to NMW when actually awake and working during sleep-in shifts, not when merely available. The contractual arrangement was lawful. The 15-minute handover claim failed as claimants did not prove they were required to work during that time. The contract did not guarantee minimum hours. Pay statements complied with statutory requirements.
Practical note
Sleep-in shift cases turn on Royal Mencap: workers are only entitled to NMW when actually awake and working, not when available to work; accommodation offset deductions are authorised by statute and not unlawful deductions; and contractual language stating hours 'not normally less than' X does not create an enforceable minimum hours guarantee.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4100377/2025
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- charity
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Employment details
- Role
- house assistant and home carer
- Service
- 4 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No