Cases2406924/2024

Claimant v Denholm Logistics Group Limited

23 October 2025Before Employment Judge Grahame AndersonManchesterremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit her claim within the primary time limit. As the claim was submitted out of time and no extension could be granted, the tribunal lacks jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.

Wrongful Dismissalstruck out

The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit her claim within the primary time limit. As the claim was submitted out of time and no extension could be granted, the tribunal lacks jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.

Holiday Paystruck out

The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit her claim within the primary time limit. As the claim was submitted out of time and no extension could be granted, the tribunal lacks jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.

Direct Discrimination(age)not determined

The tribunal exercised its discretion under s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 to extend time on just and equitable grounds. The claim was submitted out of the primary time limit but the tribunal allowed it to proceed to a full hearing on the merits.

Direct Discrimination(sex)not determined

The tribunal exercised its discretion under s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010 to extend time on just and equitable grounds. The claim was submitted out of the primary time limit but the tribunal allowed it to proceed to a full hearing on the merits.

Facts

Ms McGechen brought claims against Denholm Logistics Group Limited including unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay, age discrimination and sex discrimination. This was a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claims were brought in time. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by a solicitor.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and holiday pay claims on grounds that it was reasonably practicable to submit them in time and they were therefore out of time. However, the age and sex discrimination claims were allowed to proceed as the tribunal exercised its discretion to extend time on just and equitable grounds under the Equality Act 2010.

Practical note

A tribunal will apply different time limit tests to discrimination claims versus other employment claims, with discrimination claims having greater scope for extension on just and equitable grounds even where other claims are dismissed as out of time.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.123(1)(b)

Case details

Case number
2406924/2024
Decision date
23 October 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No