Cases6012532/2024

Claimant v Look Ahead Care and Support Limited

23 October 2025Before Employment Judge DavidsonLondon Central

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

The tribunal struck out the race discrimination claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success.

Direct Discrimination(sex)struck out

The tribunal struck out the sex discrimination claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success.

Direct Discrimination(religion)struck out

The tribunal struck out the religion or belief discrimination claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success.

Victimisationstruck out

The tribunal struck out the victimisation claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success.

Direct Discrimination(age)failed

The claim was presented outside the applicable time limit. The tribunal determined it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, and therefore dismissed the claim.

Facts

Mr Odebode brought claims of race, sex, religion/belief and age discrimination, and victimisation against Look Ahead Care and Support Limited. The matter came before the tribunal at a preliminary hearing. The claimant appeared in person while the respondent was represented by a solicitor.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the race, sex, religion and victimisation claims on the basis they had no reasonable prospect of success. The age discrimination claim was dismissed as out of time, with the tribunal refusing to extend time on just and equitable grounds.

Practical note

Litigants in person bringing multiple discrimination claims must ensure they have factual foundations with reasonable prospects of success and comply with strict time limits, or risk wholesale dismissal at preliminary hearing.

Case details

Case number
6012532/2024
Decision date
23 October 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No