Claimant v Nathan Ramm NGR Construction Ltd
Outcome
Other
Facts
This was a preliminary hearing concerning the correct respondent to the claim. Mrs Andrea Niles had brought a claim against Nathan Ramm NGR Construction Ltd. During the hearing Mr Nathan Ramm appeared in person. The tribunal addressed the issue of whether the company or the individual was the correct respondent.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the claim against Nathan Ramm NGR Construction Ltd. Mr Nathan Ramm was added as a respondent in his personal capacity and the claim continues against him individually rather than against the company.
Practical note
Claimants must ensure they name the correct respondent; tribunals can substitute or add respondents where appropriate, particularly distinguishing between a company and an individual director or owner.
Case details
- Case number
- 3304605/2024
- Decision date
- 21 October 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No