Cases2407172/2024

Claimant v Care Connect Cheshire Ltd

21 October 2025Before Employment Judge AinscoughLiverpoolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The Tribunal found that the claimant signed written agreements permitting deductions for car purchase costs, sponsorship fees, and associated employment costs. All deductions were authorised under s.13(1)(a) or s.13(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was paid the correct hourly rate for bank holidays. Travel time was incorporated into the 10 hours paid per day, and the claimant provided no evidence that she spent more time travelling than was accounted for in her pay.

Holiday Payfailed

The claimant resigned on 28 June 2024, two days before the end of the leave year (30 June). She had accrued but not taken 19 days' leave, which was lost because the contract did not permit carry-over and she did not fall within the Stringer exception (sickness absence). In the new leave year (from 1 July 2024) before her termination on 26 July 2024, she accrued approximately 2 days and was given 3 days' leave (24-26 July), so she received more than her accrued entitlement on termination.

Facts

The claimant, a care assistant employed by a domiciliary care provider from September 2023 to July 2024, was sponsored from Africa. She signed agreements permitting deductions for car purchase costs, visa fees, and certificate of sponsorship costs. She worked split shifts totalling 10 hours per day (including travel time), visiting clients in their homes. She resigned with 19 days of accrued but untaken annual leave. She claimed unlawful deductions for underpayment of bank holiday pay, travel time, sponsorship costs, car purchase costs, and unpaid holiday pay on termination.

Decision

The Tribunal dismissed all claims. The claimant had signed written agreements authorising all deductions, making them lawful under s.13 ERA 1996. The bank holiday pay was correctly calculated. Travel time was already incorporated into her paid hours and she provided no evidence of longer travel. The 19 days of accrued leave was lost at the end of the leave year (30 June 2024) because the contract did not permit carry-over, and she received more than her accrued entitlement on termination in the new leave year.

Practical note

Written contractual terms permitting deductions (including for car purchase schemes and sponsorship costs) will be lawful under s.13 ERA 1996 if signed by the employee, and employees cannot claim unpaid holiday pay for leave lost at the end of a leave year unless they fall within the Stringer exception (sickness absence preventing leave-taking).

Legal authorities cited

Stringer and ors v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund [2009] ICR 932, ECJCavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi; Parking Eye Ltd v Beavis [2016] AC 1172, SCKeen v Commerzbank AG [2007] ICR 623

Statutes

Working Time Regulations 1998 reg.13Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13Consumer Credit Act 1974Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977Working Time Regulations 1998 reg.14

Case details

Case number
2407172/2024
Decision date
21 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Care Assistant
Service
10 months

Claimant representation

Represented
No