Claimant v The Oak Tree Nursery & Pre-School Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal failed. The tribunal determined that the respondent had not breached the implied term of trust and confidence such that the claimant was entitled to resign in response to a fundamental breach of contract.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaints of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 failed. The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent treated the claimant unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of her disability.
The tribunal found that the respondent had not failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent had applied a provision, criterion or practice that put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage compared to non-disabled persons, or that reasonable adjustments were not made.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of harassment related to disability failed. The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent engaged in unwanted conduct related to the claimant's disability which had the purpose or effect of violating her dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of discriminatory constructive dismissal failed. Having found no fundamental breach of contract and no disability discrimination, the tribunal concluded that the resignation did not amount to a discriminatory dismissal.
Facts
Miss Warwick brought claims against The Oak Tree Nursery & Pre-School Limited and two individuals, Ms Clare Luff and Ms Erika Veglio. She alleged constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination including discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment, and discriminatory constructive dismissal. The hearing took place over eight days by video link.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims. The tribunal found that there was no fundamental breach of contract to justify a constructive dismissal claim, and that none of the disability discrimination complaints were made out. The claimant appeared in person with assistance from her mother, while the respondents were represented by counsel.
Practical note
An unrepresented claimant with lay support from a family member was unsuccessful in all claims after an eight-day hearing against a represented nursery employer and individual respondents.
Case details
- Case number
- 1400781/2024
- Decision date
- 20 October 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 8
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- education
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No