Claimant v VR Therapies CIC
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter dated 5 September 2025 which gave an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Facts
The claimant brought a claim against VR Therapies CIC. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 5 September 2025 warning that the claim would be struck out for not being actively pursued and giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or make any sufficient representations.
Decision
Regional Employment Judge Foxwell struck out the claim on the papers due to the claimant's failure to actively pursue it. The claimant did not respond to the tribunal's warning letter giving opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal correspondence, or risk having their claims struck out for want of prosecution.
Case details
- Case number
- 3302318/2025
- Decision date
- 20 October 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- VR Therapies CIC
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No