Cases6018913/2024

Claimant v Apexco Limited

17 October 2025Before Employment Judge MidgleyBristolremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£21,397

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The respondent conceded this claim at the hearing. The tribunal accepted the concession and found the claim well-founded, ordering payment of £17,830.80 gross redundancy pay.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The respondent conceded the claim for notice pay. The tribunal accepted the concession and found the claim well-founded, ordering payment of £2,971.80 net notice pay.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent conceded the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages. The tribunal accepted the concession and found the claim well-founded, ordering payment of £594.36 gross unpaid wages.

Facts

Miss Mitchell brought claims for redundancy pay, notice pay, and unauthorised deduction of wages against her former employer Apexco Limited. The respondent conceded all claims at the hearing before Employment Judge Midgley sitting remotely by CVP in Bristol. The matter was resolved by consent without the need for a contested hearing.

Decision

The tribunal accepted the respondent's concession and found all three claims well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay £17,830.80 gross redundancy pay, £2,971.80 net notice pay, and £594.36 gross unpaid wages, totalling £21,396.96.

Practical note

This case demonstrates the value of union representation in securing statutory entitlements, with the respondent conceding all claims before a contested hearing.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£2,972
Redundancy pay£17,831
Unpaid wages£594

Case details

Case number
6018913/2024
Decision date
17 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
union