Claimant v Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over four days and concluded that the claimant's complaints of victimisation were not well founded. The tribunal found that the respondent's actions did not constitute victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.
Facts
Ms Nags brought complaints of victimisation against her employer, Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. The case was heard over four days by video hearing. Oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by counsel.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all complaints of victimisation, finding them not well founded. The tribunal heard evidence over four days and delivered oral reasons at the hearing, concluding that the respondent had not subjected the claimant to victimisation.
Practical note
A victimisation claim brought by an unrepresented claimant against an NHS Trust failed after a four-day hearing, demonstrating the evidential burden required to establish victimisation under the Equality Act 2010.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6006896/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No