Cases2304730/2025

Claimant v Wagamama

16 October 2025Before Employment Judge SudraLondon South

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years' continuous service. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity to do so.

Facts

Mr Betts was employed by Wagamama for less than two years before his dismissal. He brought a complaint of unfair dismissal along with other complaints. The tribunal considered whether he had the necessary qualifying period of service to bring an unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have the required two years' continuous service under section 108 ERA 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason. The claimant's other complaints remain unaffected.

Practical note

Employees must have at least two years' continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and claims lacking this jurisdictional requirement will be struck out at a preliminary stage.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
2304730/2025
Decision date
16 October 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No