Cases6015657/2024

Claimant v Metalwash Ltd

15 October 2025Before Employment Judge LiveseyBristolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Breach of Contractstruck out

Claim struck out on jurisdictional grounds. Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction under Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 because the breach of contract claims related to agreements (Employee Agreement and Settlement and Waiver Letter) that either took effect after or were entered into after termination of employment. Such claims must arise or be outstanding on termination of employment. Additionally, claim was out of time, having been brought over 18 months after employment ended.

Otherstruck out

Data protection breach claim struck out as tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine such claims under Employment Tribunals Act 1996.

Otherstruck out

Stress/personal injury claim struck out as tribunal lacks jurisdiction under s.3(3) Employment Tribunals Act 1996 to determine such claims.

Facts

Claimant's employment terminated on 6 February 2023 pursuant to Settlement Agreement dated 7 November 2022, which provided £1,713 settlement payment. On same date, parties signed Employee Agreement providing for post-termination commission and MIP unit payments. Following business sale in 2024, further Settlement and Waiver Letter agreed on 26 June 2024 providing £20,000 and commission in return for release from earlier agreements. Claimant alleged breaches of all three agreements and brought claim in October 2024.

Decision

Tribunal struck out all claims under rule 38 as having no reasonable prospect of success. Breach of contract claims fell outside tribunal jurisdiction under Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 because the agreements allegedly breached (Employee Agreement and Settlement and Waiver Letter) either took effect after or were entered into after termination of employment. Claims were also out of time, being brought over 18 months after employment ended. Data protection and stress claims also outside tribunal jurisdiction.

Practical note

Employment tribunals lack jurisdiction to determine breach of contract claims arising from settlement agreements entered into or taking effect after termination of employment, even where those agreements relate back to the employment relationship.

Legal authorities cited

Balls v Downham Market High School [2011] IRLR 217Twist DX v Armes UKEAT/0030/20/JOJHM Prison Service v Dolby [2003] IRLR 694Mbuisa v Cygnet Healthcare Ltd UKEAT/0119/18Nosworthy v Indistinctif Partners Ltd UKEAT/0100/18Rock-It Cargo v Green [1997] IRLR 581Miller Bros and FP Butler v Johnston [2002] ICR 744

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Act 1996 s.3(2)(a)Employment Tribunals Act 1996 s.3(3)Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 articles 3(c), 4(c) and 7

Case details

Case number
6015657/2024
Decision date
15 October 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No