Cases2302728/2025

Claimant v Canterbury Taxis Limited

14 October 2025Before Employment Judge SiddallLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£1,925

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The tribunal found the Claimant was an employee and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £962.60, indicating the employment ended by reason of redundancy.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was not well founded and dismissed it, indicating the Respondent did not unlawfully deduct wages from the Claimant.

Holiday Payfailed

The tribunal found the claim for holiday pay was not well founded and dismissed it, indicating the Claimant was not owed accrued but unpaid holiday pay.

Breach of Contractfailed

The tribunal found the claim for damages for breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well founded and dismissed it, indicating the Respondent did not breach the contract by failing to provide proper notice or pay in lieu.

Facts

The Claimant was employed by Canterbury Taxis Limited and his employment ended by reason of redundancy. The Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment as required by statute. The Claimant brought claims for redundancy pay, unlawful deductions from wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.

Decision

The tribunal found the Claimant was an employee entitled to statutory redundancy pay of £962.60 and awarded two weeks' pay (£962.60) for the Respondent's failure to provide written particulars. The claims for unlawful deductions, holiday pay, and notice pay were dismissed as not well founded, resulting in a total award of £1,925.20.

Practical note

Employers in the taxi sector must provide written statements of particulars to their workers who qualify as employees, or face a two-week penalty award in addition to any substantive claims.

Award breakdown

Redundancy pay£963

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.1Employment Act 2002 s.38

Case details

Case number
2302728/2025
Decision date
14 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep