Cases2305972/2023

Claimant v Thurrock Borough Council

14 October 2025Before Employment Judge HartLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesstruck out

The claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so. The tribunal therefore dismissed this claim for being out of time.

Breach of Contractstruck out

The claim related to arrears of pay during and up to termination. It was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so, therefore dismissed.

Direct Discriminationnot determined

The judgment explicitly states that the claimant's complaints for discrimination have not been dismissed at this time. These claims remain live for future determination.

Harassmentnot determined

The judgment explicitly states that the claimant's complaints for harassment have not been dismissed at this time. These claims remain live for future determination.

Victimisationnot determined

The judgment explicitly states that the claimant's complaints for victimisation have not been dismissed at this time. These claims remain live for future determination.

Facts

Ms Gherghel brought multiple claims against Thurrock Borough Council including unlawful deduction of wages, breach of contract for arrears of pay, and various discrimination, harassment and victimisation complaints. This preliminary hearing addressed the time limit issues for the wage-related claims. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented her unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract claims within time.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract claims as out of time, finding it was reasonably practicable to have presented them within the applicable time limit. The tribunal explicitly preserved the claimant's discrimination, harassment and victimisation complaints which remain live and have not been dismissed.

Practical note

Even self-represented claimants are expected to meet statutory time limits for wage-related claims where it is reasonably practicable to do so, but discrimination claims may survive preliminary challenges and proceed to full hearing.

Case details

Case number
2305972/2023
Decision date
14 October 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No