Cases6010535/2025

Claimant v Sitemix Direct Ltd

13 October 2025Before Employment Judge Phil AllenManchesterin person

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£9,808

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was not transferred to the second respondent under TUPE and that the first respondent failed to pay statutory redundancy payment to which she was entitled.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the first respondent dismissed the claimant in breach of contract by failing to provide eight weeks' notice or payment in lieu thereof.

Facts

Mrs Healey was employed by Sitemix Direct Ltd. The claim concerned whether she transferred to Exact Concrete Ltd under TUPE regulations. The tribunal found no TUPE transfer occurred. The first respondent made her redundant but failed to pay statutory redundancy payment and failed to provide eight weeks' notice as required.

Decision

The tribunal ruled there was no TUPE transfer to the second respondent. The first respondent was ordered to pay statutory redundancy payment of £5,192.28 and damages for wrongful dismissal equivalent to eight weeks' notice (£4,615.36). All claims against the second respondent were dismissed.

Practical note

Where an alleged TUPE transfer fails, the original employer remains liable for redundancy payments and notice pay obligations.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£4,615
Redundancy pay£5,192

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006

Case details

Case number
6010535/2025
Decision date
13 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No