Claimant v Four Seasons Fruiterers Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract was not well-founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Facts
Phillip Eccles brought claims against Four Seasons Fruiterers Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages, unfair dismissal, and breach of contract. The case was heard by CVP over two days in Southampton. Both parties were represented by counsel. Only the judgment has been published with no written reasons provided.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all three claims brought by the claimant, finding that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, unfair dismissal, and breach of contract were not well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Practical note
This judgment provides no substantive legal guidance as only the decision is published without written reasons explaining the tribunal's findings.
Case details
- Case number
- 6013106/2024
- Decision date
- 10 October 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- retail
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister