Cases1804060/2024

Claimant v The Sheffield College of Further Education

10 October 2025Before Employment Judge BrainSheffieldin person

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Indirect Discrimination(disability)not determined

This was a strike-out application hearing. The respondent's strike-out application was dismissed and the substantive claims of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation were not determined at this hearing.

Victimisation(disability)not determined

This was a strike-out application hearing. The respondent's strike-out application was dismissed and the substantive claims of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation were not determined at this hearing.

Facts

The claimant brought claims of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation against the Sheffield College. The respondent applied to strike out the claims based on alleged unreasonable conduct arising from incidents at a student showcase event on 25 June 2025. Three incidents were alleged: a comment by the claimant's witness, an alleged hand gesture by the claimant towards respondent's witnesses, and an incident between the claimant's witness and a respondent witness in a corridor. The tribunal heard evidence from both parties on the strike-out application.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the respondent's strike-out application. The tribunal found that one alleged incident did not occur (the hand gesture), and the other incidents were either not the claimant's conduct or did not amount to unreasonable conduct affecting the fairness of the trial. The tribunal held that striking out would be disproportionate at the point of trial, particularly where adjustments such as screens could enable witnesses to give evidence.

Practical note

Strike out on grounds of unreasonable conduct requires proof that the party (not merely their witness) engaged in conduct that makes a fair trial impossible, and it remains a draconian remedy that is disproportionate if alternative measures can ensure fairness.

Legal authorities cited

Hargreaves v Evolve Housing [2023] EAT 154Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James [2006] EWCA Civ 684Force One Utilities Ltd v Hatfield [2009] IRLR 45

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 38(1)(b)Equality Act 2010

Case details

Case number
1804060/2024
Decision date
10 October 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
4
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No