Claimant v The Sheffield College of Further Education
Outcome
Individual claims
This was a strike-out application hearing. The respondent's strike-out application was dismissed and the substantive claims of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation were not determined at this hearing.
This was a strike-out application hearing. The respondent's strike-out application was dismissed and the substantive claims of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation were not determined at this hearing.
Facts
The claimant brought claims of indirect disability discrimination and victimisation against the Sheffield College. The respondent applied to strike out the claims based on alleged unreasonable conduct arising from incidents at a student showcase event on 25 June 2025. Three incidents were alleged: a comment by the claimant's witness, an alleged hand gesture by the claimant towards respondent's witnesses, and an incident between the claimant's witness and a respondent witness in a corridor. The tribunal heard evidence from both parties on the strike-out application.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the respondent's strike-out application. The tribunal found that one alleged incident did not occur (the hand gesture), and the other incidents were either not the claimant's conduct or did not amount to unreasonable conduct affecting the fairness of the trial. The tribunal held that striking out would be disproportionate at the point of trial, particularly where adjustments such as screens could enable witnesses to give evidence.
Practical note
Strike out on grounds of unreasonable conduct requires proof that the party (not merely their witness) engaged in conduct that makes a fair trial impossible, and it remains a draconian remedy that is disproportionate if alternative measures can ensure fairness.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1804060/2024
- Decision date
- 10 October 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- education
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No