Cases3310886/2023

Claimant v Secretary of State for Justice

8 October 2025Before Employment Judge AlliottWatford

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the Secretary of State for Justice. The reasons given orally at the hearing were not recorded in the written judgment, but the claim succeeded on the merits.

Direct Discrimination(race)failed

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's direct race discrimination claim, finding that the respondent did not treat the claimant less favourably because of her race.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found that the claimant's dismissal was an act of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, meaning the dismissal was because of something arising in consequence of the claimant's disability and the respondent could not show it was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found the respondent failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments by not exploring redeployment opportunities and not redeploying the claimant to an alternative prison. This failure placed the claimant at a substantial disadvantage compared to non-disabled employees.

Facts

Ms King was employed by the Secretary of State for Justice in a prison setting. She was dismissed from her employment. She brought claims of unfair dismissal, direct race discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The case concerned the respondent's failure to explore and implement redeployment to an alternative prison as a reasonable adjustment.

Decision

The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that the dismissal was discrimination arising from disability. The respondent also failed to make reasonable adjustments by not exploring or implementing redeployment. However, the direct race discrimination claim was dismissed.

Practical note

Employers must actively explore and implement redeployment opportunities as a reasonable adjustment for disabled employees facing dismissal, particularly in large public sector organisations with multiple sites.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
3310886/2023
Decision date
8 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
5
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
Secretary of State for Justice
Sector
central government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister