Cases2412216/2023

Claimant v Wirral Borough Council

8 October 2025Before Employment Judge LloydManchesterremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal found that while the claimant had a mental impairment (anxiety and depression) with a long-term effect, it did not have a substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The effects on sleep, appetite and concentration were intermittent and minor. The claimant was able to work throughout the relevant period (save for two months in 2021), wanted more hours, and occupational health reports confirmed he could carry out day-to-day activities independently and was fit for work. The claimant therefore did not meet the definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010.

Facts

The claimant worked as a part-time Museum Assistant for Wirral Borough Council from November 2018 until his dismissal in July 2023. He had a history of recurrent depression and anxiety dating back to 1997, with symptoms including low mood, sleep disturbance, poor concentration and altered appetite. He was intermittently prescribed anti-depressants but rarely took them for prolonged periods as he felt they did not help. He received counselling through the Employee Assistance Programme. He was absent from work due to anxiety and depression for two months in July-August 2021, but otherwise remained in work throughout the relevant period and in June 2021 expressed a wish to work more hours.

Decision

The tribunal found that while the claimant had a mental impairment with a long-term effect, it did not have a substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The effects on sleep, appetite and concentration were intermittent and minor. Occupational health reports confirmed he could manage day-to-day activities independently and was fit for work. He did not meet the definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010, and his disability discrimination claims were therefore dismissed.

Practical note

A long-standing mental health diagnosis and intermittent symptoms do not automatically establish disability status; the claimant must prove substantial (more than minor or trivial) adverse effects on day-to-day activities, and ability to remain in work and function independently will weigh against a finding of substantial adverse effect.

Legal authorities cited

SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle [2009] ICR 1056Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce [2001] IRLR 19Patel v Metropolitan Borough Council [2010] IRLR 280

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.6Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 12Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 5Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 2Equality Act 2010 s.212

Case details

Case number
2412216/2023
Decision date
8 October 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
public sector
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Museum Assistant
Service
5 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No