Claimant v Wirral Borough Council
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that while the claimant had a mental impairment (anxiety and depression) with a long-term effect, it did not have a substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The effects on sleep, appetite and concentration were intermittent and minor. The claimant was able to work throughout the relevant period (save for two months in 2021), wanted more hours, and occupational health reports confirmed he could carry out day-to-day activities independently and was fit for work. The claimant therefore did not meet the definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010.
Facts
The claimant worked as a part-time Museum Assistant for Wirral Borough Council from November 2018 until his dismissal in July 2023. He had a history of recurrent depression and anxiety dating back to 1997, with symptoms including low mood, sleep disturbance, poor concentration and altered appetite. He was intermittently prescribed anti-depressants but rarely took them for prolonged periods as he felt they did not help. He received counselling through the Employee Assistance Programme. He was absent from work due to anxiety and depression for two months in July-August 2021, but otherwise remained in work throughout the relevant period and in June 2021 expressed a wish to work more hours.
Decision
The tribunal found that while the claimant had a mental impairment with a long-term effect, it did not have a substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The effects on sleep, appetite and concentration were intermittent and minor. Occupational health reports confirmed he could manage day-to-day activities independently and was fit for work. He did not meet the definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010, and his disability discrimination claims were therefore dismissed.
Practical note
A long-standing mental health diagnosis and intermittent symptoms do not automatically establish disability status; the claimant must prove substantial (more than minor or trivial) adverse effects on day-to-day activities, and ability to remain in work and function independently will weigh against a finding of substantial adverse effect.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2412216/2023
- Decision date
- 8 October 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- public sector
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- Museum Assistant
- Service
- 5 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No