Claimant v Castlefield Hospitality Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) because the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 9 April 2025 and did not actively pursue the complaint. The claimant was given the opportunity to object to the proposed strike-out but made no representations.
Facts
Mr Chowdhury brought a claim against Castlefield Hospitality Limited. The Tribunal made an order on 9 April 2025 which the claimant failed to comply with. On 31 July 2025, the Tribunal proposed to strike out the claim and gave the claimant an opportunity to object. The claimant made no representations in response to the proposed strike-out.
Decision
Employment Judge Benson struck out all complaints under Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) because the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order and had not actively pursued the complaints. The claimant was given an opportunity to object but made no representations.
Practical note
Claimants must comply with tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims, or risk strike-out even after being given an opportunity to provide reasons why the claim should continue.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6010472/2025
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No