Claimant v Simply Solutions (Europe) Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The complaint of breach of contract and wrongful dismissal at common law was withdrawn by the claimant with consent to dismissal.
The tribunal found that the claimant was not able to establish primary facts from which discrimination could be provisionally assumed. Where she could establish such facts, the evidence rebutted the presumption that the treatment (e.g. lack of updates on appeal, no appeal meeting, content of communications) was because of her pregnancy.
The tribunal found that the treatment alleged (including dismissal and various procedural failings) was not unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy. The evidence showed that performance concerns had been raised during probation and dismissal was for legitimate performance reasons, not pregnancy.
The sole reason for dismissal was that the claimant had not performed well enough during her probationary period (timekeeping, communication, collaboration, team management, self-development, decision making). Pregnancy was not the sole or main reason for dismissal, nor was it a significant influence.
Facts
The claimant was employed as Client Relations Manager from June 2024 to January 2025 on probation. She had performance concerns raised during probation regarding timekeeping, communication, collaboration, decision-making and self-development. She informed her manager of her pregnancy in October 2024. On 7 January 2025, at short notice, she was told her probation had failed and she was dismissed. She appealed, believing the real reason was her pregnancy, but the appeal was dismissed with detailed reasons about performance failings.
Decision
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed for legitimate performance reasons during probation, not because of her pregnancy or intention to take maternity leave. The alleged procedural failings (lack of notice of meeting, lack of appeal hearing, lack of updates) were not discriminatory acts. The evidence showed performance issues had been raised and the claimant's pregnancy had no influence on the decision to dismiss.
Practical note
A dismissal during probation for performance reasons can be lawful even if the employee is pregnant, provided there is clear evidence that pregnancy did not influence the decision and that similar performance concerns were addressed with non-pregnant comparators.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 8000822/2025
- Decision date
- 4 October 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- Client Relations Manager
- Service
- 6 months
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor