Cases6007231/2024

Claimant v Aviva Employment Servies Ltd

3 October 2025Before Employment Judge C SharpCardiff

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal heard full merits evidence over five days and determined that the dismissal was fair. The employer followed a proper process and had sufficient grounds to dismiss the claimant.

Wrongful Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent was entitled to dismiss the claimant without notice. The claimant's conduct constituted a repudiatory breach of contract justifying summary dismissal.

Direct Discrimination(religion)failed

The tribunal concluded that the claimant was not treated less favourably because of his philosophical or religious belief. The treatment complained of was not connected to the protected characteristic.

Indirect Discrimination(religion)failed

The tribunal found that the respondent did not apply a provision, criterion or practice that put the claimant at a particular disadvantage because of his belief, or if it did, it was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Harassment(religion)failed

The tribunal determined that the conduct complained of did not amount to harassment related to the claimant's belief. The conduct did not have the purpose or effect of violating the claimant's dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

Facts

Mr Rogers brought claims against Aviva Employment Services Ltd relating to his dismissal and alleged discrimination based on belief. The case was heard over five days with full evidence from both parties represented by counsel. The tribunal considered claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and three forms of belief discrimination.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all five claims brought by the claimant. The tribunal found the dismissal was both procedurally and substantively fair, that there was no breach of contract justifying a wrongful dismissal claim, and that none of the discrimination claims were made out on the evidence.

Practical note

A claimant bringing multiple claims including dismissal and belief discrimination must provide sufficient evidence to establish both the factual basis and the connection to the protected characteristic for discrimination claims to succeed.

Case details

Case number
6007231/2024
Decision date
3 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
5
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
financial services
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister