Cases2225464/2024

Claimant v Selina Management Company UK Limited

3 October 2025Before Employment Judge NorrisLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£77,444

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The Respondent did not file an ET3 and did not appear at the hearing. The tribunal was satisfied that the Respondent had not shown it had a fair reason for dismissal. The claim therefore succeeded under Rule 21.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The Respondent had not shown that the Claimant was in repudiatory breach of contract which might have entitled it to dismiss without notice. The Claimant was contractually entitled to three months' notice and did not receive any notice or payment in lieu.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The Claimant had carried over holiday from previous years due to COVID and went off sick before taking it. His last payslip showed payment only for days accrued in 2024, not prior accrual. He was owed 67.4 days of outstanding holiday pay.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The Claimant submitted an expenses claim for £333.44 which remained outstanding. The tribunal was satisfied the Claimant had properly evidenced his entitlement to this amount.

Facts

The Claimant was employed as Country Finance Director from July 2019 to May 2024 on an annual salary of £80,000. In August 2023 his personal laptop was stolen leading to a theft from the Respondent's German bank account. The Respondent launched disciplinary proceedings and dismissed the Claimant on 31 May 2024. The Claimant went off sick in October 2023 and did not return to work. The Respondent did not file an ET3 or appear at the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal proceeded in the Respondent's absence under Rule 21. All claims succeeded: unfair dismissal (the Respondent had not shown a fair reason), notice pay (no repudiatory breach shown), holiday pay (67.4 days outstanding from carryover), and expenses (£333.44). Total award of £77,444.49 with grossing up provisions applied.

Practical note

In Rule 21 default judgment cases, tribunals will still scrutinise the claimant's evidence and calculations, but the burden remains on the absent respondent to prove fair dismissal, repudiatory breach, or failure to mitigate.

Award breakdown

Basic award£3,500
Compensatory award£36,429
Notice pay£20,000
Holiday pay£20,682

Award equivalent: 50.3 weeks' gross pay

Case details

Case number
2225464/2024
Decision date
3 October 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Country Finance Director
Salary band
£80,000–£100,000
Service
5 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No