Claimant v Secretary of State for Justice

The tribunal found that the complaint of breach of contract was not well founded and dismissed the claim, though specific reasoning for the dismissal was not provided in this judgment summary.

The tribunal found that the complaint of direct sex discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed the claim, indicating that the claimant did not establish less favourable treatment on the ground of her sex.

The tribunal found that the complaint of victimisation was not well-founded and dismissed the claim, suggesting that the claimant did not establish that she was subjected to a detriment because of doing a protected act.

The tribunal found that the complaint of harassment related to sex was not well-founded and dismissed the claim, indicating that the conduct complained of did not meet the statutory test for harassment.

The tribunal found that the complaint of indirect sex discrimination was well-founded and succeeded, indicating that the respondent applied a provision, criterion or practice that put women at a particular disadvantage which could not be objectively justified.

The claimant brought claims of less favourable treatment as a part-time worker. The tribunal found that the claim relating to not being allowed to work from home during 5-11 July 2024 was well-founded and succeeded, but the remaining part-time worker complaints failed.