Cases1307045/2024

Claimant v Cheshire Curtainsiders Ltd

2 October 2025Before Employment Judge McGoughBirmingham

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£42,405

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal to be well-founded. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, indicating procedural failures in the dismissal process. However, the claimant's own blameworthy conduct contributed to the dismissal, warranting reductions to both the basic and compensatory awards.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed by Cheshire Curtainsiders Ltd, a transport company. The tribunal heard the case over two days in September 2025. The respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code on disciplinary procedures when dismissing the claimant. However, the claimant engaged in some blameworthy conduct that contributed to the dismissal.

Decision

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair due to the respondent's failure to comply with the ACAS Code on disciplinary procedures, warranting a 25% uplift to the compensatory award. However, recognizing the claimant's contributory fault, both the basic and compensatory awards were reduced by 25%. The claimant was awarded a total of £42,405.02.

Practical note

Even where an employer's procedural failings lead to an unfair dismissal finding with an ACAS uplift, a tribunal can still apply reductions for the employee's contributory conduct, potentially offsetting the uplift and significantly reducing the overall award.

Award breakdown

Basic award£3,938
Compensatory award£38,468

Adjustments

Contributory fault25%

The claimant caused or contributed to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct and it was just and equitable to reduce the compensatory award by 25%

ACAS uplift+25%

The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, resulting in a 25% uplift to the compensatory award

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.207A

Case details

Case number
1307045/2024
Decision date
2 October 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister