Cases3308755/2024

Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited

1 October 2025Before Employment Judge Mr G. KingCambridgeremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£11,941

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed as determined at the previous full merits hearing. The tribunal ordered reinstatement as the appropriate remedy.

Facts

The claimant was employed as an Operational Postal Grade Worker at Royal Mail's Ipswich Sorting Office and was dismissed. At a previous hearing, the tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair. This remedy hearing was convened to determine appropriate compensation, though the parties had agreed the remedy through their respective solicitors before the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal ordered reinstatement of the claimant to his former role with effect from 11th December 2025, with full restoration of pay, benefits and continuity of employment. The respondent was ordered to pay £11,940.86 gross in arrears of pay. The claimant was ordered to pay £360 in costs for proceeding with the hearing when remedy had already been agreed.

Practical note

Reinstatement remains a viable remedy in unfair dismissal cases, and tribunals will award costs against parties who proceed with hearings on issues that have already been settled between representatives.

Award breakdown

Arrears of pay£11,941

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.114Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 Rule 74(2)(a)

Case details

Case number
3308755/2024
Decision date
1 October 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Operational Postal Grade (OPG) Worker

Claimant representation

Represented
No