Claimant v LRG Employees Limited
Outcome
Facts
This is a reconsideration judgment concerning an application made by the claimant on 15 October 2025 following a judgment sent on 2 October 2025 after a full merits hearing on 1-4 September 2025. The claimant, who represented herself at the hearing and has EUPD, argued she experienced procedural unfairness, zoned out during evidence, lacked the ability to cross-examine effectively, and that documents were potentially fake. The tribunal had made reasonable adjustments including breaks and positioning of witnesses.
Decision
The tribunal refused the reconsideration application finding no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. The claimant had received reasonable adjustments, had ample opportunity to obtain legal representation or support, conducted extensive cross-examination over several hours, and had opportunity to present all evidence she wished to rely on prior to the final hearing. The application amounted to disagreement with findings rather than grounds meeting the interests of justice test.
Practical note
A reconsideration application based on self-represented status, general procedural complaints, and disagreement with findings will be refused where the tribunal provided reasonable adjustments and the claimant had full opportunity to present their case and obtain representation.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3300560/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2025
- Hearing type
- reconsideration
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No