Claimant v Lintech UK Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit. The claimant's representative indicated they no longer wished to pursue legal action, and despite being given multiple opportunities to confirm withdrawal or explain why the claim should not be struck out, the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's correspondence.
Facts
The claimant brought a claim against Lintech UK Limited. On 6 August 2025, the claimant's representative advised the Tribunal they no longer wished to pursue legal action. The Tribunal sought confirmation from the claimant regarding withdrawal on 7 August 2025, but received no response. On 27 August 2025, the claimant was given until 3 September 2025 to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but failed to do either.
Decision
The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to multiple opportunities to explain why the claim should proceed or to request a hearing.
Practical note
Claimants must respond to tribunal correspondence and actively pursue their claims, or risk having them struck out for non-pursuit even after filing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4101068/2025
- Decision date
- 30 September 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- technology
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No