Claimant v Tesco Supermarket
Outcome
Individual claims
Struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(c) and (d). The claimant did not respond to the strike out warning letter dated 17 September 2025 and failed to comply with the Tribunal order dated 17 June 2025.
Facts
Miss Denson brought a claim against Tesco Supermarket. The Tribunal issued an order on 17 June 2025 which the claimant failed to comply with. A strike out warning letter was sent on 17 September 2025 but the claimant did not respond.
Decision
The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(c) and (d) for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the warning letter and failed to comply with a previous tribunal order, demonstrating the claim was not being actively pursued.
Practical note
Claimants must respond to tribunal orders and strike out warning letters or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even without a merits hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3311787/2024
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- retail
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No