Claimant v Call Us Dental Spa Limited
Outcome
Other
Facts
This was a preliminary hearing to consider the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claim. The claimant was represented by a friend and the respondent by a consultant. The hearing was conducted remotely by CVP.
Decision
Employment Judge Anderson refused the respondent's application for strike out of the claim. The claim will continue to a full hearing.
Practical note
The tribunal found that the respondent's strike out application did not meet the high threshold required and allowed the claim to proceed.
Case details
- Case number
- 2403718/2024
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep