Cases6009943/2024

Claimant v Pure Luxuries London Ltd

26 September 2025Before Employment Judge SlaterManchesterremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This was a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claimant was disabled by reason of autism at the relevant times. The tribunal found that she was disabled, establishing jurisdiction for the substantive discrimination claims.

Facts

This was a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claimant was disabled by reason of autism at the relevant times. The hearing was held remotely by CVP. Both parties were legally represented, with the claimant represented by a solicitor and the respondent by counsel.

Decision

Employment Judge Slater determined that the claimant was disabled at relevant times by reason of autism. This preliminary determination establishes that the claimant meets the disability threshold under the Equality Act 2010, allowing her discrimination claims to proceed to a substantive hearing.

Practical note

This preliminary hearing established disability status for autism, a threshold requirement for pursuing disability discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

EqA 2010

Case details

Case number
6009943/2024
Decision date
26 September 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor