Cases2600812/2025

Claimant v Savace Limited

26 September 2025Before Employment Judge ClarkMidlands Easton papers

Outcome

Default judgment£913

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under rule 21 that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to statutory redundancy payment calculated on the basis of weekly pay of £456.72 for 1 year of service.

Facts

The claimant Kiran Naz was dismissed by reason of redundancy by Savace Limited. The claim was filed on 18 March 2025 in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, allowing the tribunal to make a determination under rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.

Decision

Employment Judge Clark issued a default judgment under rule 21 awarding the claimant statutory redundancy payment of £913.44, calculated on the basis of weekly pay of £456.72 for one year of service. The previously scheduled hearing was cancelled.

Practical note

Where a respondent fails to file a response, a tribunal can make a rule 21 default judgment awarding statutory redundancy pay based on the claimant's stated facts without a hearing.

Award breakdown

Redundancy pay£913

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
2600812/2025
Decision date
26 September 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
1 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No