Cases6017580/2025

Claimant v Barworks Ltd

26 September 2025Before Employment Judge LambertLondon Eastremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£2,128

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the Claimant was entitled to receive normal pay during the period of suspension. The respondent had unlawfully withheld wages during this suspension period, constituting an unlawful deduction from wages.

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear this claim because the Claimant did not have 2 years' continuous service at the effective date of termination, as required by Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Victimisationfailed

The tribunal found that the complaint of victimisation under Section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded. The respondent's actions did not constitute victimisation as defined by the Act.

Wrongful Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent was entitled to dismiss the Claimant for gross misconduct. The dismissal was lawful and did not constitute a breach of contract, therefore the wrongful dismissal claim failed.

Facts

Mr Mola was employed by Barworks Ltd and was suspended from work. During his suspension, the respondent did not pay him his normal wages. He was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct. He brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages, unfair dismissal, victimisation under the Equality Act, and wrongful dismissal.

Decision

The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to normal pay during suspension and awarded £2,128.28 gross for unlawful deduction of wages. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the claimant had less than 2 years' service. The victimisation and wrongful dismissal claims failed as the tribunal found the dismissal for gross misconduct was justified.

Practical note

Employers must pay employees during suspension unless the contract clearly states otherwise, but gross misconduct can justify summary dismissal even where other claims succeed.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£2,128

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108EqA 2010 s.27

Case details

Case number
6017580/2025
Decision date
26 September 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No