Claimant v D&H Equipment
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) because the claimants did not attend the hearing and the claims have not been actively pursued.
Claim struck out under Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) because the claimants did not attend the hearing and the claims have not been actively pursued.
Facts
Two claimants, Mr B Kedward and Mr J Wilkinson, brought claims against D&H Equipment for holiday pay and redundancy pay. Both claimants and the respondent failed to attend the scheduled hearing by video on 26 September 2025.
Decision
Employment Judge KM Ross struck out both claims under Rules 47 and 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 due to the claimants' non-attendance at the hearing and their failure to actively pursue their claims.
Practical note
Claimants must attend scheduled hearings and actively pursue their claims or risk having them struck out for non-pursuit, even where the respondent also does not attend.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2401838/2025
- Decision date
- 26 September 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- D&H Equipment
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No