Cases6015316/2024

Claimant v Future Academies

25 September 2025Before Employment Judge BaranWatfordin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Constructive Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent's conduct in imposing a performance improvement plan, and the manner in which it was done, did not amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. The respondent had legitimate performance concerns, reasonable and proper cause for its actions, and was acting consistently with its performance improvement policy. The conduct was not calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence, and was consistent with attempting to continue the employment relationship rather than abandoning it.

Facts

The claimant was Head of Mathematics at a secondary academy operated by the respondent. From September 2023, she received regular coaching and feedback from the respondent's Mathematics Lead identifying performance concerns. On 22 May 2024 she was told she would be placed on a support plan, which was confirmed on 24 May 2024 by the Principal. During the meeting on 24 May, the Principal told her she needed to be more assertive and to 'upset people' in her department (meaning have difficult conversations), confirmed capability procedures would follow if she failed the plan unless there were mitigating features, and said she would need to reapply for her role if she resigned but passed the plan. The claimant resigned on 30 May 2024, the last day before the resignation deadline for teachers.

Decision

The tribunal found that the respondent's conduct did not breach the implied term of mutual trust and confidence. The performance improvement plan was imposed in response to legitimate performance concerns that had been raised with the claimant over many months. The respondent had reasonable and proper cause for its actions, which were consistent with its performance improvement policy and with continuing the employment relationship. The principal's comments at the 24 May meeting were frank but proper responses to direct questions from the claimant. There was no constructive dismissal and the claim was dismissed.

Practical note

Imposing a performance improvement plan in response to longstanding, legitimate performance concerns does not breach the implied term of trust and confidence, even if the formal plan is introduced relatively suddenly, provided the employee has been given prior feedback about performance issues and the employer acts consistently with its policies.

Legal authorities cited

Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International [1998] AC 20Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] EWCA Civ 121Woods v WM Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd [1982] IRLR 413Western Excavating v Sharp [1978] ICR 221Claridge v Daler Rowney Ltd [2008] IRLR 672Frenkel Topping Ltd v King UKEAT/0105/15/LA

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98Employment Rights Act 1996 s.95(1)(c)

Case details

Case number
6015316/2024
Decision date
25 September 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Head of Mathematics

Claimant representation

Represented
No