Cases6018631/2025

Claimant v SJS Property Management Limited

25 September 2025Before Employment Judge KM Rosson papers

Outcome

Default judgment£960

Individual claims

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under Rule 22 that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages calculated on gross pay basis.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim for wrongful dismissal relating to notice pay against SJS Property Management Limited. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, triggering the tribunal's Rule 22 procedure for default judgments.

Decision

Employment Judge KM Ross determined under Rule 22 that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent was ordered to pay damages of £960.00, calculated on a gross basis to reflect the likelihood of tax liability on post-employment notice pay. The scheduled hearing was cancelled.

Practical note

Rule 22 allows tribunals to make determinations on the papers where respondents fail to present valid responses, resulting in default judgments for breach of contract claims including notice pay.

Award breakdown

Notice pay£960

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 22

Case details

Case number
6018631/2025
Decision date
25 September 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
real estate
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No