Claimant v CCL North Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed pursuant to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent established a fair reason for dismissal and followed a fair procedure.
The tribunal found that the claim in respect of breach of contract was not well founded and dismissed it. The respondent did not breach the claimant's contract of employment.
Facts
Mr W Davidson brought claims against CCL North Limited for unfair dismissal and breach of contract. The claimant was represented by his daughter, Ms Davidson, while the respondent was represented by counsel. The hearing took place over four days in Glasgow. During the hearing, the claimant withdrew some complaints.
Decision
The tribunal unanimously dismissed all claims. The unfair dismissal claim failed under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the breach of contract claim was found not to be well founded. Other complaints were dismissed having been withdrawn during the hearing.
Practical note
The respondent successfully defended both unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims, establishing both a fair reason for dismissal and procedural fairness.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 8000402/2025
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep