Claimant v Barker Care Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant was not constructively dismissed. This means the tribunal concluded that the respondent had not committed a fundamental breach of contract that entitled the claimant to resign and treat themselves as dismissed.
The unfair dismissal claim failed as a consequence of the constructive dismissal claim failing. Without establishing that the claimant was dismissed (either actually or constructively), there can be no finding of unfair dismissal.
The tribunal found that the claimant's holiday pay in March 2024 was underpaid by £577.83 gross, constituting an unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal also found that holiday pay accrued and outstanding on termination amounting to £1,155 gross had not been paid, which was also an unlawful deduction.
The tribunal upheld two separate holiday pay claims: underpayment of £577.83 for March 2024 holiday pay, and £1,155 for accrued and outstanding holiday pay on termination. Both awards were treated as unlawful deductions from wages.
Facts
Mrs Pascubillo brought claims against her former employer Barker Care Limited, a care company, for constructive unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages relating to underpaid holiday pay. The claimant alleged she had been constructively dismissed and was also owed holiday pay for March 2024 and accrued holiday pay on termination. The hearing took place over two days in September 2025 before Employment Judge Butler sitting alone.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the constructive dismissal and unfair dismissal claims, finding that the claimant had not been constructively dismissed. However, the tribunal upheld the holiday pay claims in full, awarding £577.83 for underpaid March 2024 holiday pay and £1,155 for accrued holiday pay outstanding on termination, totalling £1,732.83 gross.
Practical note
Even where constructive dismissal claims fail, employers remain liable for straightforward contractual breaches such as underpaid or unpaid holiday pay, which can be successfully pursued as unlawful deduction from wages claims.
Award breakdown
Case details
- Case number
- 2406836/2024
- Decision date
- 23 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep