Cases1308816/2023

Claimant v Druids Heath Golf Club Limited

22 September 2025Before Employment Judge Isabel ManleyMidlands Westremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal determined that the claimant was a worker within the meaning of section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but not an employee within the meaning of section 230(1) and (2). As unfair dismissal claims are only available to employees and not workers, the claimant had no entitlement to bring an unfair dismissal claim and it was therefore dismissed.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal against Druids Heath Golf Club Limited. The central issue was the claimant's employment status. The tribunal heard evidence over three days in September 2025 via remote video hearing.

Decision

The tribunal determined that the claimant was a worker but not an employee under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Because unfair dismissal rights are only available to employees, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds.

Practical note

This case illustrates the critical distinction between worker and employee status, particularly that workers do not have the right to claim unfair dismissal despite having other employment protections.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.230(1)ERA 1996 s.230(2)ERA 1996 s.230(3)

Case details

Case number
1308816/2023
Decision date
22 September 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister