Claimant v Whitbread Group Plc
Outcome
Individual claims
Preliminary hearing dealt only with time limit issue. Tribunal found claim was out of time (last discriminatory act occurred 18 March 2024, time expired 17 June 2024, claim filed 4 November 2024) but exercised discretion to extend time under s.123(2)(b) Equality Act 2010 on just and equitable grounds. Claim may now proceed to full merits hearing.
Section 15 claim (discrimination arising from disability) was referenced in the judgment as part of the overall disability discrimination claim. No determination on merits made at this preliminary stage - claim may proceed.
Facts
The claimant was a receptionist with multiple sclerosis who had been off work since December 2021. She contended she had been fit to return to work with reasonable adjustments from August 2023, but the respondent delayed implementing agreed adjustments (transfer to York, reduced hours from full-time to 16 hours per week, no bedroom cleaning, phased return). On 15 March 2024 the respondent confirmed the adjustments in writing. The claimant eventually returned to work on 25 June 2024 after logistical arrangements including accrued holiday were resolved. She claimed failure to make reasonable adjustments and loss of earnings for the period when she says she could have worked.
Decision
The tribunal found the claim was out of time by approximately 4.5 months (last discriminatory act 18 March 2024, time expired 17 June 2024, claim filed 4 November 2024). However, the judge exercised discretion to extend time under the just and equitable test, finding the claimant had relied on union and solicitor advice, the delay was not her fault, she had an arguable case, and the respondent would suffer no forensic prejudice. The claim may proceed to a full merits hearing.
Practical note
A tribunal may extend time on just and equitable grounds even where a claim is 4.5 months late if the claimant reasonably relied on representative advice, has an arguable disability discrimination claim, and the respondent suffers no evidential prejudice.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6017336/2024
- Decision date
- 19 September 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- Receptionist
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister