Cases6017336/2024

Claimant v Whitbread Group Plc

19 September 2025Before Employment Judge LancasterLeedsremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)not determined

Preliminary hearing dealt only with time limit issue. Tribunal found claim was out of time (last discriminatory act occurred 18 March 2024, time expired 17 June 2024, claim filed 4 November 2024) but exercised discretion to extend time under s.123(2)(b) Equality Act 2010 on just and equitable grounds. Claim may now proceed to full merits hearing.

Direct Discrimination(disability)not determined

Section 15 claim (discrimination arising from disability) was referenced in the judgment as part of the overall disability discrimination claim. No determination on merits made at this preliminary stage - claim may proceed.

Facts

The claimant was a receptionist with multiple sclerosis who had been off work since December 2021. She contended she had been fit to return to work with reasonable adjustments from August 2023, but the respondent delayed implementing agreed adjustments (transfer to York, reduced hours from full-time to 16 hours per week, no bedroom cleaning, phased return). On 15 March 2024 the respondent confirmed the adjustments in writing. The claimant eventually returned to work on 25 June 2024 after logistical arrangements including accrued holiday were resolved. She claimed failure to make reasonable adjustments and loss of earnings for the period when she says she could have worked.

Decision

The tribunal found the claim was out of time by approximately 4.5 months (last discriminatory act 18 March 2024, time expired 17 June 2024, claim filed 4 November 2024). However, the judge exercised discretion to extend time under the just and equitable test, finding the claimant had relied on union and solicitor advice, the delay was not her fault, she had an arguable case, and the respondent would suffer no forensic prejudice. The claim may proceed to a full merits hearing.

Practical note

A tribunal may extend time on just and equitable grounds even where a claim is 4.5 months late if the claimant reasonably relied on representative advice, has an arguable disability discrimination claim, and the respondent suffers no evidential prejudice.

Legal authorities cited

Science Warehouse Ltd v Mills [2015] 10 WLUK 251 EATJones v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2024 EAT 2Miller and ors v Ministry of Justice and ors EAT 0003.15Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan [2018] ICR 1194Compass Group UK & Ireland v Morgan [2017] ICR 73 EATThe Commissioners of HM Revenue and Customs v Serra Garau [2017] ICR 1121

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.123(2)(b)Employment Tribunals Act 1996 s.18A(1)Equality Act 2010 s.123(4)Equality Act 2010 s.123(3)(b)Equality Act 2010 s.123(3)(a)

Case details

Case number
6017336/2024
Decision date
19 September 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Receptionist

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister