Claimant v Wagamama Limited

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established that she was treated less favourably because of her disability. The claims for direct disability discrimination were not upheld.

The tribunal determined that the claimant had not proven discrimination arising out of disability. The respondent's treatment of the claimant was not found to be because of something arising in consequence of her disability.

The tribunal concluded that the alleged conduct did not amount to disability-related harassment. The claimant failed to establish that the respondent engaged in unwanted conduct related to disability that violated her dignity or created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

The tribunal found that the respondent had not failed to make reasonable adjustments. The claimant did not establish that the respondent had a duty to make adjustments or that it failed to comply with any such duty.

The claimant's claim that she resigned in response to an act of discrimination was not upheld. The tribunal did not find that the respondent's conduct amounted to a fundamental breach entitling her to resign or that her resignation was in response to discriminatory treatment.