Claimant v LAVAT Consulting Limited T/A PSTAX
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence and submissions from both parties and concluded that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract was not well founded and therefore dismissed the claim.
The tribunal considered the claimant's complaint regarding unpaid wages and determined that it was not well founded, resulting in dismissal of this claim.
Facts
Ms Browne brought claims against LAVAT Consulting Limited (trading as PSTAX) for breach of contract and unpaid wages. The case was heard at Reading Employment Tribunal with the claimant appearing in person assisted by a family friend as lay representative. The respondent was represented by counsel.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed both claims, finding that the complaints of breach of contract and unpaid wages were not well founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Practical note
Without written reasons, the specific basis for the tribunal's findings on contract and wages claims cannot be determined from this judgment alone.
Case details
- Case number
- 3308896/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No